Osage vs Costa Rican Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Osage
Costa Rican
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Osage
Costa Ricans
32.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
37.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
20.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Costa Rican Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,866,368 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 32.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,618,809 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 32.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.0% | 95.2% |
| Mean | 41.9% | 40.4% |
| Median | 33.0% | 33.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.9% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 47.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.5% | 20.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.2% | 21.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.8% | 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Costa Ricans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Czechoslovakian (32.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (32.0%, a difference of 0.11%), German (32.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South America (32.0%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants (32.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (32.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Thailand (32.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Samoan (32.6%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Canadians | 41.4 /100 | #183 | Average 31.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 40.7 /100 | #184 | Average 32.0% |
| Germans | 39.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 32.0% |
| Welsh | 38.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 32.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
| Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
| Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
| Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
| Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
| Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
| Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
| Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |