New Zealander vs Tsimshian Average Family Size
COMPARE
New Zealander
Tsimshian
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
New Zealanders
Tsimshian
3.15
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
80.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Tsimshian Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,893,950 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 3.15. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 3.25, a difference of 3.0%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 2.02 | 2.80 |
| Maximum | 4.25 | 3.68 |
| Range | 2.23 | 0.88 |
| Mean | 3.07 | 3.26 |
| Median | 3.11 | 3.20 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.87 | 3.13 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.22 | 3.50 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.39 | 0.25 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.39 | 0.24 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Belgium (3.15, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Lithuania (3.15, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (3.15, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Germany (3.15, a difference of 0.030%), and Tlingit-Haida (3.16, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Immigrants | Greece | 0.9 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Iroquois | 0.8 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Maltese | 0.8 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.7 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.7 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.7 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 0.6 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.15 |
| New Zealanders | 0.6 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.6 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Cambodians | 0.6 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.5 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Swiss | 0.5 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Okinawans | 0.5 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Immigrants | Europe | 0.5 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Immigrants | England | 0.4 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.15 |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Bhutanese (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (3.25, a difference of 0.040%), and Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Bhutanese | 81.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Tsimshian | 80.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Armenians | 78.2 /100 | #145 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Africa | 77.9 /100 | #146 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 75.7 /100 | #147 | Good 3.24 |
| Blackfeet | 75.0 /100 | #148 | Good 3.24 |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 73.8 /100 | #149 | Good 3.24 |
| Indians (Asian) | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 3.24 |
| Jordanians | 73.5 /100 | #151 | Good 3.24 |