Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Malaysia
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
23.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
17.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,743,433 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,925,894 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.304 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 0.12%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 27.6% | 34.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 85.4% |
Range | 72.4% | 50.9% |
Mean | 65.5% | 62.8% |
Median | 65.5% | 64.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.1% | 59.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.3% | 68.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Malaysia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are French (64.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Arab (64.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Asia (64.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Spanish Americans | 30.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 64.1% |
Northern Europeans | 28.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 64.1% |
Paraguayans | 26.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 64.1% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |