Immigrants from Northern Africa vs South American Indian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,016,323 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 27.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,526,695 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.55%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Northern Africa	South American Indian
Minimum	8.9%	9.4%
Maximum	49.2%	48.9%
Range	40.3%	39.5%
Mean	28.0%	27.5%
Median	27.6%	26.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	24.2%	23.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.5%	32.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.2%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.3%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.2%	8.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and South American Indians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Singapore (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Ecuadorian (27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (27.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Belizean (27.8%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%