Immigrants from Jordan vs Australian Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,993,428 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056 and weighted average of 29.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,996,225 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592 and weighted average of 29.5%, a difference of 2.0%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jordan	Australian
Minimum	2.9%	16.0%
Maximum	60.6%	100.0%
Range	57.7%	84.0%
Mean	26.6%	51.9%
Median	27.3%	47.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	18.5%	27.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	32.6%	74.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.1%	46.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.2%	27.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.1%	27.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Australians by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Sri Lankan (28.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (29.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from France (29.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Poland (28.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (29.1%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Lithuanian (29.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Denmark (29.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Luxembourger (29.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants \| Poland	97.6 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.9%
Sri Lankans	97.5 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.9%
Immigrants \| Jordan	97.4 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 29.0%
Taiwanese	97.3 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| France	97.3 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	97.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 29.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 29.1%
Immigrants \| Fiji	96.6 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 29.2%
Arabs	96.5 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 29.2%
Estonians	96.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 29.2%
Ukrainians	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 29.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	96.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 29.3%
Norwegians	95.8 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 29.3%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.7 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 29.3%
Immigrants \| Syria	95.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Denmark	95.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 29.4%
Luxembourgers	95.2 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	94.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 29.5%
Australians	94.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 29.5%
Lebanese	94.4 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 29.5%
Lithuanians	94.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 29.6%