Immigrants from Cameroon vs Syrian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cameroon
Syrian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Cameroon
Syrians
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Syrian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,734,594 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cameroon and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,181,919 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 64.5%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cameroon | Syrian |
| Minimum | 47.1% | 29.0% |
| Maximum | 92.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.8% | 71.0% |
| Mean | 67.2% | 68.3% |
| Median | 66.0% | 66.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 61.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.3% | 75.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cameroon and Syrians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cameroon are Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |