Immigrants from Bolivia vs Sri Lankan Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Sri Lankan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Sri Lankans
66.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Sri Lankan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,720,883 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 66.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,096,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 67.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 35.4% | 42.7% |
| Maximum | 92.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.4% | 57.3% |
| Mean | 67.3% | 73.1% |
| Median | 67.9% | 73.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 67.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.0% | 78.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Sri Lankans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Guamanian/Chamorro (66.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from El Salvador (67.0%, a difference of 0.62%), Mexican American Indian (67.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Cuban (67.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (67.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (67.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (67.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from India (67.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.6% |