Czech vs Filipino Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Czech
Filipino
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Czechs
Filipinos
49.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
51.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Filipino Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,447,060 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 49.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,164,182 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 51.0%, a difference of 3.1%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Filipino |
Minimum | 20.8% | 38.0% |
Maximum | 89.3% | 81.1% |
Range | 68.5% | 43.0% |
Mean | 54.5% | 57.6% |
Median | 53.7% | 56.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 49.8% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.5% | 65.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Filipinos by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Dutch (49.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (49.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Philippines (49.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Norwegian (49.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and European (49.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Danish (51.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Chinese (50.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Tongan (51.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.3% |