Creek vs Iroquois Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Creek
Iroquois
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Creek
Iroquois
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Iroquois Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,233,897 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 38.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Iroquois |
Minimum | 7.7% | 23.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 76.9% |
Mean | 50.2% | 56.3% |
Median | 45.8% | 53.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.5% | 40.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.2% | 68.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.7% | 27.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 20.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Iroquois by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alaskan Athabascan (37.7%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Alaska Native (38.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Dutch West Indian (38.4%, a difference of 0.52%), British West Indian (38.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (38.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and Jamaican (38.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 38.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 38.5% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 38.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 38.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 38.6% |