Creek vs British West Indian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Creek
British West Indian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Creek
British West Indians
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs British West Indian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,832,690 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 38.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | British West Indian |
Minimum | 7.7% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.8% |
Range | 92.3% | 72.4% |
Mean | 50.2% | 40.6% |
Median | 45.8% | 39.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.5% | 33.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.2% | 48.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.7% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and British West Indians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alaskan Athabascan (37.7%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (38.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Blackfeet (37.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Seminole (37.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Iroquois (38.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and Hispanic or Latino (37.8%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 38.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 38.5% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 38.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 38.6% |