Chilean vs Jordanian Family Households
COMPARE
Chilean
Jordanian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chileans
Jordanians
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Jordanian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,564,731 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 65.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,395,405 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.61%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Jordanian |
Minimum | 35.8% | 52.5% |
Maximum | 82.2% | 87.5% |
Range | 46.4% | 35.0% |
Mean | 66.3% | 69.1% |
Median | 66.7% | 67.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.0% | 65.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 72.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Jordanians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Central American Indian (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Lebanon (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Guyana (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), American (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (65.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Egyptian (65.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |