Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Panama Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,008,789 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332 and weighted average of 27.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,156,248 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.686 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 0.78%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Central American Indian	Immigrants from Panama
Minimum	9.0%	4.9%
Maximum	56.2%	37.4%
Range	47.2%	32.4%
Mean	27.1%	21.9%
Median	28.1%	24.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	20.2%	17.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.0%	27.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.8%	10.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.0%	8.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.9%	8.3%

Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Immigrants from Panama by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), European (27.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (27.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Iranian (27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (27.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Portugal (27.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (27.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Lebanese (27.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 27.8%
Ecuadorians	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	90.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 27.8%
Belizeans	90.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 27.8%
Syrians	89.7 /100 \| #128	Excellent 27.8%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	89.4 /100 \| #129	Excellent 27.8%
Cajuns	87.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 27.7%
Lebanese	87.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Belize	85.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 27.7%
Iranians	85.2 /100 \| #133	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Panama	84.9 /100 \| #134	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	84.6 /100 \| #135	Excellent 27.7%
Immigrants \| Portugal	84.1 /100 \| #136	Excellent 27.7%