Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,008,789 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.332 and weighted average of 27.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,961,015 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.32%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Central American Indian	Immigrants from Uganda
Minimum	9.0%	3.2%
Maximum	56.2%	47.7%
Range	47.2%	44.5%
Mean	27.1%	27.2%
Median	28.1%	28.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	20.2%	22.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.0%	30.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.8%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.0%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.9%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Immigrants from Uganda by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), European (27.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%