Barbadian vs Latvian Family Households
COMPARE
Barbadian
Latvian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Barbadians
Latvians
62.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Latvian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,274,787 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 62.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,652,081 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 0.48%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 41.7% | 31.0% |
| Maximum | 83.8% | 92.3% |
| Range | 42.1% | 61.3% |
| Mean | 64.7% | 65.1% |
| Median | 63.8% | 65.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.8% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.5% | 70.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Barbadians and Latvians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Okinawan (62.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (62.4%, a difference of 0.020%), French American Indian (62.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (62.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Spain (62.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (62.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (62.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
| Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |
| Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 62.4% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |