African vs Bulgarian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
African
Bulgarian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Africans
Bulgarians
27.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
13.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
5.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Bulgarian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,417,507 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,477,079 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 27.0%, a difference of 0.50%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | African | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 10.8% |
Maximum | 57.1% | 43.4% |
Range | 54.2% | 32.7% |
Mean | 26.8% | 27.2% |
Median | 26.7% | 27.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.1% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.7% | 29.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Africans and Bulgarians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Northern European (27.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (27.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Okinawan (27.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Cuban (27.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (27.1%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Luxembourger (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Caribbean (27.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (27.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Czechoslovakian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tsimshian (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Luxembourgers | 5.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Yugoslavians | 5.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |