Immigrants from Turkey vs Indian (Asian) Associate's Degree

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,053,786 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.557 and weighted average of 53.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,274,508 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with at least associate's degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177 and weighted average of 54.8%, a difference of 2.5%.

Associate's Degree Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Turkey	Indian (Asian)
Minimum	26.0%	30.4%
Maximum	74.2%	86.5%
Range	48.2%	56.1%
Mean	53.0%	57.3%
Median	55.2%	58.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	45.2%	50.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	61.1%	63.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.9%	13.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.7%	11.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.4%	11.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Indians (Asian) by Associate's Degree

In terms of associate's degree, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Northern Europe (53.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (53.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bulgarian (53.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Russian (53.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (53.7%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Ireland (54.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (54.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Sweden (54.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Japan (54.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Burmese (54.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Associate's Degree
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 55.4%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 55.1%
Eastern Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 55.0%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 54.8%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 54.7%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 54.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 54.6%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 54.6%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 54.6%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 54.5%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 54.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 54.5%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 53.9%
Turks	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 53.9%
Immigrants \| France	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 53.9%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 53.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 53.5%
Immigrants \| Turkey	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 53.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 53.4%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 53.3%
Russians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 53.2%