Immigrants from Oceania vs Jordanian Professional Degree
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Jordanian
Professional Degree
Professional Degree Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Jordanians
4.6%
PROFESSIONAL DEGREE
73.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
PROFESSIONAL DEGREE
88.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Jordanian Professional Degree Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,056,134 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,340,382 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 3.7%.
Professional Degree Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 11.7% | 9.9% |
| Range | 11.1% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 4.4% |
| Median | 2.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Jordanians by Professional Degree
In terms of professional degree, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Polish (4.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Africa (4.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uruguay (4.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Senegalese (4.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Slovene (4.6%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Jordan (4.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Macedonian (4.8%, a difference of 0.30%), South American Indian (4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Italian (4.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Professional Degree |
| Italians | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| South American Indians | 89.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 4.8% |
| Macedonians | 89.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.7% |
| Jordanians | 88.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.7% |
| Afghans | 88.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.7% |
| South Americans | 85.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 4.7% |
| Canadians | 84.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 4.7% |
| Basques | 81.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 4.6% |
| Sudanese | 81.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 4.6% |
| Hungarians | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 4.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 80.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 4.6% |
| Uruguayans | 80.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 4.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 4.6% |
| Colombians | 77.7 /100 | #147 | Good 4.6% |
| Slovenes | 76.1 /100 | #148 | Good 4.6% |
| Senegalese | 75.3 /100 | #149 | Good 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 73.4 /100 | #150 | Good 4.6% |
| Poles | 72.6 /100 | #151 | Good 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 72.5 /100 | #152 | Good 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 4.6% |