Immigrants from Latvia vs South African 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
South African
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
South Africans
98.1%
2ND GRADE
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.2%
2ND GRADE
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs South African 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,735,345 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 98.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,602,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | South African |
| Minimum | 95.3% | 96.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 4.7% | 3.3% |
| Mean | 99.0% | 99.2% |
| Median | 99.4% | 99.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.4% | 98.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and South Africans by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Norway (98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Singapore (98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Colville (98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (98.1%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Germany (98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Choctaw (98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Ireland (98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
| Immigrants | Germany | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| South Africans | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Cypriots | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Romanians | 98.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Cree | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Pima | 97.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Turks | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 97.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Bhutanese | 97.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| German Russians | 97.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.3 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| Basques | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 97.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 96.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| Colville | 96.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 96.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 98.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 96.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 98.1% |