Chickasaw vs Sioux Professional Degree
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Sioux
Professional Degree
Professional Degree Comparison
Chickasaw
Sioux
3.4%
PROFESSIONAL DEGREE
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
PROFESSIONAL DEGREE
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Sioux Professional Degree Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,338,770 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,329,443 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.352 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 2.7%.
Professional Degree Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Sioux |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.086% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 8.2% |
| Range | 6.6% | 8.1% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 2.5% |
| Median | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.98% | 1.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Sioux by Professional Degree
In terms of professional degree, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Cape Verdean (3.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Cajun (3.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Haiti (3.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Malaysian (3.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Samoan (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yuman (3.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (3.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Cherokee (3.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Latin America (3.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Professional Degree |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.2 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.2 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Malaysians | 0.2 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.2 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Samoans | 0.1 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.1 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #310 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #311 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #312 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #313 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #314 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.1 /100 | #315 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.1 /100 | #316 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.1 /100 | #317 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.1 /100 | #318 | Tragic 3.2% |