White/Caucasian vs Pennsylvania German Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Pennsylvania German
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Pennsylvania Germans
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Pennsylvania German Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,664,974 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,073,505 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 0.90%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Pennsylvania German |
Minimum | 5.9% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 10.5% | 36.5% |
Range | 4.6% | 35.4% |
Mean | 7.1% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.7% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.96% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.96% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Pennsylvania Germans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Yaqui (6.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (6.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Barbadian (6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from West Indies (6.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |