Vietnamese vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Carpatho Rusyn
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Vietnamese
Carpatho Rusyns
10.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
25.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Vietnamese vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,653,846 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 8.8%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Vietnamese | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 3.2% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 19.9% | 38.7% |
Range | 16.7% | 35.0% |
Mean | 10.3% | 14.0% |
Median | 10.1% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Vietnamese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Romanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Norway (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Tongans | 96.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 95.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Vietnamese | 95.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Maltese | 94.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Estonians | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 94.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 94.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Iraqi (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (11.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Iraq (11.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Northern Europeans | 34.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.4% |
Hungarians | 34.6 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 32.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.4% |
Swedes | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.4% |
Norwegians | 29.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 11.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 29.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 27.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 25.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.5% |
Iraqis | 24.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.5% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |