Ute vs Nonimmigrants Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Ute
Nonimmigrants
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Ute
Nonimmigrants
13.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Nonimmigrants Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,463 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,562,173 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 2.6%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Nonimmigrants |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 45.1% | 20.0% |
| Range | 37.7% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 19.3% | 9.8% |
| Median | 17.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Nonimmigrants by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Puget Sound Salish (13.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Congo (13.3%, a difference of 0.52%), Yaqui (13.5%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Liberia (13.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and Indonesian (13.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Central American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Somalia (13.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Laos (13.0%, a difference of 0.53%), Scotch-Irish (13.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Hmong (13.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 13.6% |