Subsaharan African vs Navajo Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
 Navajo
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Navajo
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Navajo Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,779,988 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Navajo | 
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.7% | 
| Maximum | 40.3% | 36.3% | 
| Range | 38.0% | 33.6% | 
| Mean | 18.5% | 18.6% | 
| Median | 18.5% | 18.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 16.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 20.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 4.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Navajo by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Pima (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Kiowa (18.7%, a difference of 0.22%), U.S. Virgin Islander (18.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Senegal (18.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311  | Tragic 18.4%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312  | Tragic 18.5%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 18.5%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 18.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 18.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 18.6%  | 
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 18.6%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 18.6%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 18.6%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 18.6%  | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 18.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 18.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 18.8%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 18.8%  |