Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Ecuadorian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Ecuadorians
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Ecuadorian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,507,273 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,812,387 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 0.67%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 5.5% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 32.6% | 22.2% |
Range | 27.2% | 15.7% |
Mean | 16.8% | 16.2% |
Median | 16.6% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Ecuadorians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Tlingit-Haida (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Turkey (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Syria (17.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |