Indian (Asian) vs Ethiopian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Ethiopian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Ethiopians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Ethiopian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,167,947 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.020%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 0.51% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 9.8% |
Range | 12.4% | 9.6% |
Mean | 5.2% | 4.9% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Ethiopians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |