Immigrants from Zaire vs Ghanaian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zaire
 Ghanaian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zaire
Ghanaians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zaire vs Ghanaian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,249,797 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.836 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,620,307 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.37%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zaire | Ghanaian | 
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.27% | 
| Maximum | 14.0% | 8.2% | 
| Range | 12.9% | 7.9% | 
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.3% | 
| Median | 2.1% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zaire and Ghanaians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% | 
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% | 
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |