Immigrants from Uruguay vs Nicaraguan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
 Nicaraguan
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Nicaraguans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Nicaraguan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,251,950 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,654,753 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 0.79%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Nicaraguan | 
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% | 
| Maximum | 10.4% | 8.8% | 
| Range | 9.2% | 7.6% | 
| Mean | 3.6% | 2.8% | 
| Median | 2.8% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.58% | 0.81% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Nicaraguans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Armenia (2.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cuba (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Colombian (2.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Mongolian (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Africa (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (2.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Central American (2.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Afghan (2.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.5 /100 | #75  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 2.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 2.8%  |