Immigrants from Uganda vs Croatian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
 Croatian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Croatians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Croatian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,949,603 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,377,812 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.21%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Croatian | 
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.57% | 
| Maximum | 5.8% | 10.2% | 
| Range | 5.3% | 9.6% | 
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.7% | 
| Median | 2.0% | 2.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.00% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Croatians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Ugandan (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |