Immigrants from Thailand vs Croatian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Croatian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Croatians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
51.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Croatian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,651,055 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.48%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Croatian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 15.0% | 32.1% |
| Range | 13.9% | 30.6% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 8.8% |
| Median | 6.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Croatians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |