Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Luxembourger Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Luxembourger
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Luxembourgers
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Luxembourger Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,648,116 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,609,683 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.11% |
| Maximum | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| Range | 4.6% | 5.5% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Median | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.68% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.74% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Luxembourgers by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Cypriot (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (2.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |