Immigrants from Singapore vs Luxembourger Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Luxembourger
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Luxembourgers
2.1%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Luxembourger Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,406,292 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,609,683 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 3.2%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 0.11% |
| Maximum | 4.7% | 5.6% |
| Range | 4.4% | 5.5% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Median | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.94% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.93% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore and Luxembourgers by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Zimbabwean (2.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Filipino (2.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Bolivia (2.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Bolivian (2.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Nepal (2.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (2.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |