Immigrants from Spain vs Japanese Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
 Japanese
 Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Japanese
1.2%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.2%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
90.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Japanese Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,109,645 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 1.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,189,921 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 1.2%, a difference of 0.87%.
 
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Japanese | 
| Minimum | 0.48% | 0.40% | 
| Maximum | 6.9% | 3.5% | 
| Range | 6.4% | 3.1% | 
| Mean | 2.0% | 1.3% | 
| Median | 1.4% | 1.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 0.87% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 1.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.58% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 0.70% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 0.69% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Japanese by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (1.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Argentinean (1.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Serbia (1.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Korean (1.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants (1.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (1.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Zimbabwean (1.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Aleut (1.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Central American (1.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Senegal (1.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 | 
| Bhutanese | 92.5 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 92.3 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Senegal | 91.4 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 1.2%  | 
| Aleuts | 90.7 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 1.2%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 90.6 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 90.5 /100 | #124  | Exceptional 1.2%  | 
| Japanese | 90.3 /100 | #125  | Exceptional 1.2%  | 
| Central Americans | 89.7 /100 | #126  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.4 /100 | #127  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | France | 88.4 /100 | #128  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 88.0 /100 | #129  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Koreans | 87.7 /100 | #130  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 87.6 /100 | #131  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 87.3 /100 | #132  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 86.5 /100 | #133  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Argentineans | 85.7 /100 | #134  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Fijians | 84.7 /100 | #135  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Moroccans | 83.6 /100 | #136  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 83.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 82.8 /100 | #138  | Excellent 1.2%  | 
| New Zealanders | 81.4 /100 | #139  | Excellent 1.2%  |