Immigrants from Mexico vs Icelander Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Icelander
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Icelanders
17.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
6.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Icelander Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,604,710 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,644,345 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191 and weighted average of 17.6%, a difference of 0.91%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Icelander |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 41.3% | 26.7% |
| Range | 39.6% | 26.3% |
| Mean | 18.0% | 13.3% |
| Median | 17.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Icelanders by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Iraq (17.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Osage (17.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (17.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Tongan (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Salvadoran (17.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Zimbabwean (17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Moroccan (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Central American (17.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Salvadorans | 6.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Icelanders | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Osage | 2.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Spanish American Indians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 1.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 17.8% |