Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from China Disability Age 65 to 74

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Immigrants from Kazakhstan Immigrants from China

COMPARE

Immigrants from Kazakhstan

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan JordanKazakhstanKenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Immigrants from China

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America ChileChinaColombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Disability Age 65 to 74

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64Disability Age 65 to 74Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison

Immigrants from Kazakhstan

Immigrants from China

Exceptional

22.4%

DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74

93.9/ 100

METRIC RATING

120th/ 347

METRIC RANK

20.3%

DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

9th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Immigrants from China Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,413,271 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 22.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,755,580 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.360 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 10.6%.

Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Kazakhstan	Immigrants from China
Minimum	4.3%	4.7%
Maximum	70.4%	30.0%
Range	66.1%	25.3%
Mean	23.9%	17.3%
Median	21.8%	18.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	18.2%	14.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	24.8%	20.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.6%	6.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.8%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.8%	4.6%

Similar Demographics by Disability Age 65 to 74

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Disability Age 65 to 74

In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Czech (22.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Jordan (22.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Hungarian (22.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (22.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Swedish (22.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 65 to 74
Syrians	95.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 22.3%
Ukrainians	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 22.3%
Laotians	94.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 22.3%
Brazilians	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 22.4%
Swedes	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 22.4%
Austrians	94.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	94.7 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	93.9 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 22.4%
Czechs	93.5 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Jordan	93.5 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 22.4%
Hungarians	93.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 22.4%
Norwegians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 22.5%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	92.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 22.5%
Lebanese	92.2 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 22.5%
Slovaks	91.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 22.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Disability Age 65 to 74

In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (20.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ireland (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Korea (20.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Singapore (20.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and Thai (20.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 65 to 74
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 19.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 19.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 19.9%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 19.9%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 20.1%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 20.1%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 20.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 20.3%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 20.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 20.4%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 20.4%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 20.5%
Paraguayans	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 20.5%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 20.5%

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 65 to 74
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 19.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 19.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 19.9%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 19.9%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 20.1%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 20.1%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 20.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 20.3%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 20.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 20.4%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 20.4%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 20.5%
Paraguayans	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 20.5%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 20.5%