Immigrants from Japan vs Turkish Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Turkish
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Turks
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Turkish Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,950,646 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,748,480 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 0.78%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.20% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 10.6% | 7.5% |
Range | 10.4% | 6.8% |
Mean | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Median | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 0.65% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Turks by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Pakistan (1.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Asian (1.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |