Immigrants from Indonesia vs Bhutanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Bhutanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Bhutanese
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Bhutanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,759,467 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,984,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.56%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 8.4% | 5.1% |
| Range | 8.1% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 2.0% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 0.76% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Bhutanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Eastern European (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |