Immigrants from Turkey vs Bhutanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Bhutanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Bhutanese
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Bhutanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,977,745 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,984,678 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.69%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 27.1% | 5.1% |
| Range | 26.1% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 2.0% |
| Median | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.80% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 0.76% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Bhutanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Mongolian (1.9%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |