Immigrants from France vs Sudanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Sudanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from France
Sudanese
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Sudanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,866,791 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,129,493 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from France | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 12.0% | 12.3% |
| Range | 10.4% | 10.2% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 5.8% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France and Sudanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |