Immigrants from Croatia vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,570,235 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%.

Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Croatia	Chinese
Minimum	0.25%	4.2%
Maximum	40.9%	33.9%
Range	40.6%	29.7%
Mean	10.8%	12.1%
Median	9.9%	10.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.3%	8.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.0%	12.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.7%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.3%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.3%	6.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia and Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64

In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Latvian (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Russian (10.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 35 to 64
Mongolians	99.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 10.1%
Jordanians	99.3 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	99.3 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 10.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.3 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 10.2%
Latvians	99.2 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 10.2%
Russians	99.2 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 10.2%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.2 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 10.2%
Sri Lankans	99.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 10.2%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	99.1 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 10.2%
Immigrants \| Europe	99.1 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 10.2%
Nicaraguans	99.1 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 10.2%
Chileans	99.0 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 10.2%
Uruguayans	99.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 10.2%
Afghans	98.9 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 10.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	98.9 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 10.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	98.7 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 10.3%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	98.7 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 10.3%
Immigrants \| Italy	98.7 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 10.3%
Chinese	98.7 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 10.3%
Immigrants \| South Africa	98.5 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 10.3%
Immigrants \| Denmark	98.4 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 10.3%