Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Alaska Native Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Alaska Native
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Alaska Natives
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
24.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
29.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Alaska Native Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,637,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,753,099 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.35%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh | Alaska Native |
| Minimum | 0.46% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 15.9% | 15.1% |
| Range | 15.4% | 13.8% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Alaska Natives by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |