Filipino vs Immigrants from Romania Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
 Immigrants from Romania
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Immigrants from Romania
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Immigrants from Romania Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,348,780 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.480 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,996,926 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 0.020%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Immigrants from Romania | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 4.5% | 
| Maximum | 26.8% | 23.1% | 
| Range | 24.8% | 18.6% | 
| Mean | 13.8% | 14.6% | 
| Median | 14.2% | 15.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 12.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 16.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Immigrants from Romania by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Czech (16.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Croatia (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Luxembourger (16.4%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Czech (16.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Israel (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Croatia (16.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Russians | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 16.4% | 
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 16.5% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 16.5% | 
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 16.5% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 16.5% |