Brazilian vs Immigrants from Japan Disability Age Over 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,321,526 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,657,036 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 46.3%, a difference of 0.27%.

Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Brazilian	Immigrants from Japan
Minimum	19.7%	21.4%
Maximum	75.0%	100.0%
Range	55.3%	78.6%
Mean	46.6%	50.9%
Median	45.8%	46.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	42.9%	40.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	50.2%	49.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.3%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.3%	19.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.3%	19.4%

Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Japan by Disability Age Over 75

In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Uruguay (46.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kuwait (46.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (46.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Chile (46.5%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Finnish (46.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (46.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (46.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (46.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Over 75
Ugandans	98.2 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 46.3%
Albanians	98.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| Brazil	98.0 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| China	98.0 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 46.3%
Finns	97.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	97.8 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 46.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	97.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 46.3%
Mongolians	97.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 46.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 46.4%
Ukrainians	97.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 46.4%
Israelis	97.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	96.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	96.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 46.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	96.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 46.4%
Brazilians	96.6 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 46.5%
Chileans	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	96.4 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 46.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	96.1 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 46.5%
Irish	96.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 46.5%