Alsatian vs Bangladeshi Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Bangladeshi
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Alsatians
Bangladeshis
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Bangladeshi Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,680,655 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,366,446 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 0.22% | 0.71% |
Maximum | 12.1% | 9.0% |
Range | 11.9% | 8.3% |
Mean | 4.9% | 3.3% |
Median | 4.0% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 0.90% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Bangladeshis by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Australian (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |