Alaska Native vs Guatemalan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Guatemalan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaska Natives
Guatemalans
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
29.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
30.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Guatemalan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,753,099 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,382,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.010%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaska Native | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 15.1% | 13.2% |
| Range | 13.8% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.4% |
| Median | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives and Guatemalans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |