Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Work from Home vs State vs National
1.7411451.6%43.8%(+7.80)#13744.0%(+7.60)#7,000
2.7412650.4%43.8%(+6.60)#16144.0%(+6.40)#8,184
3.7413749.3%43.8%(+5.50)#18344.0%(+5.30)#9,316
4.7414649.0%43.8%(+5.20)#18644.0%(+5.00)#9,653
5.7413148.8%43.8%(+5.00)#19244.0%(+4.80)#9,925
6.7411647.0%43.8%(+3.20)#23244.0%(+3.00)#12,036
7.7412946.6%43.8%(+2.80)#24044.0%(+2.60)#12,450
8.7413646.4%43.8%(+2.60)#24944.0%(+2.40)#12,706
9.7412845.8%43.8%(+2.00)#26444.0%(+1.80)#13,372
10.7412745.3%43.8%(+1.50)#27544.0%(+1.30)#13,999
11.7410545.2%43.8%(+1.40)#27944.0%(+1.20)#14,115
12.7413345.1%43.8%(+1.30)#28144.0%(+1.10)#14,194
13.7410743.1%43.8%(-0.700)#32744.0%(-0.900)#16,540
14.7414542.7%43.8%(-1.10)#33344.0%(-1.30)#17,001
15.7413042.4%43.8%(-1.40)#34444.0%(-1.60)#17,377
16.7413442.3%43.8%(-1.50)#34644.0%(-1.70)#17,435
17.7413541.0%43.8%(-2.80)#36944.0%(-3.00)#18,704
18.7411239.8%43.8%(-4.00)#38944.0%(-4.20)#19,766
19.7411537.9%43.8%(-5.90)#41844.0%(-6.10)#21,111
20.7410837.5%43.8%(-6.30)#43044.0%(-6.50)#21,429
21.7413237.4%43.8%(-6.40)#43344.0%(-6.60)#21,491
22.7411936.9%43.8%(-6.90)#43844.0%(-7.10)#21,734
23.7410436.2%43.8%(-7.60)#44444.0%(-7.80)#22,089
24.7412036.0%43.8%(-7.80)#44544.0%(-8.00)#22,167
25.7410635.8%43.8%(-8.00)#44644.0%(-8.20)#22,275
26.7411027.5%43.8%(-16.3)#48444.0%(-16.5)#24,205
27.7410323.2%43.8%(-20.6)#48844.0%(-20.8)#24,446
28.7417119.9%43.8%(-23.9)#49744.0%(-24.1)#24,744

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
51.6%
#2
50.4%
#3
49.3%
#4
49.0%
#5
48.8%
#6
47.0%
#7
46.6%
#8
46.4%
#9
45.8%
#10
45.3%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa, OK?
74114 has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa, OK with 51.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in Tulsa is 43.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in Oklahoma is 43.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.