Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States

70.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States

Zip Code % Work from Home vs State vs National
1. 99612, Alaska 94.1% 45.9% (+48.2)#1 44.0% (+50.1)#1
2. 63940, Missouri 87.2% 44.1% (+43.1)#1 44.0% (+43.2)#2
3. 62822, Illinois 86.1% 43.1% (+43.0)#1 44.0% (+42.1)#3
4. 13338, New York 84.2% 42.4% (+41.8)#1 44.0% (+40.2)#4
5. 81081, Colorado 82.4% 43.6% (+38.8)#1 44.0% (+38.4)#5
6. 57433, South Dakota 82.2% 46.5% (+35.7)#1 44.0% (+38.2)#6
7. 47922, Indiana 82.1% 44.5% (+37.6)#1 44.0% (+38.1)#7
8. 68711, Nebraska 82.1% 44.3% (+37.8)#1 44.0% (+38.1)#8
9. 98850, Washington 81.4% 43.0% (+38.4)#1 44.0% (+37.4)#9
10. 24983, West Virginia 81.1% 45.7% (+35.4)#1 44.0% (+37.1)#10
11. 58464, North Dakota 81.1% 45.0% (+36.1)#1 44.0% (+37.1)#11
12. 51525, Iowa 81.0% 44.6% (+36.4)#1 44.0% (+37.0)#12
13. 24265, Virginia 80.4% 43.9% (+36.5)#1 44.0% (+36.4)#13
14. 23828, Virginia 80.4% 43.9% (+36.5)#2 44.0% (+36.4)#14
15. 15849, Pennsylvania 80.3% 44.2% (+36.1)#1 44.0% (+36.3)#15
16. 12860, New York 80.3% 42.4% (+37.9)#2 44.0% (+36.3)#16
17. 71940, Arkansas 79.9% 43.2% (+36.7)#1 44.0% (+35.9)#17
18. 61773, Illinois 79.9% 43.1% (+36.8)#2 44.0% (+35.9)#18
19. 77640, Texas 79.7% 43.1% (+36.6)#1 44.0% (+35.7)#19
20. 51527, Iowa 79.4% 44.6% (+34.8)#2 44.0% (+35.4)#20
21. 59545, Montana 79.4% 46.2% (+33.2)#1 44.0% (+35.4)#21
22. 05907, Vermont 79.3% 49.0% (+30.3)#1 44.0% (+35.3)#22
23. 95562, California 79.2% 43.4% (+35.8)#1 44.0% (+35.2)#23
24. 71456, Louisiana 79.2% 43.8% (+35.4)#1 44.0% (+35.2)#24
25. 87752, New Mexico 79.0% 47.3% (+31.7)#1 44.0% (+35.0)#25
26. 11005, New York 78.5% 42.4% (+36.1)#3 44.0% (+34.5)#26
27. 68328, Nebraska 78.5% 44.3% (+34.2)#2 44.0% (+34.5)#27
28. 62217, Illinois 78.3% 43.1% (+35.2)#3 44.0% (+34.3)#28
29. 78569, Texas 78.1% 43.1% (+35.0)#2 44.0% (+34.1)#29
30. 05774, Vermont 78.1% 49.0% (+29.1)#2 44.0% (+34.1)#30
31. 68442, Nebraska 78.1% 44.3% (+33.8)#3 44.0% (+34.1)#31
32. 57027, South Dakota 77.9% 46.5% (+31.4)#2 44.0% (+33.9)#32
33. 28366, North Carolina 77.5% 44.2% (+33.3)#1 44.0% (+33.5)#33
34. 59212, Montana 77.5% 46.2% (+31.3)#2 44.0% (+33.5)#34
35. 17729, Pennsylvania 77.5% 44.2% (+33.3)#2 44.0% (+33.5)#35
36. 43006, Ohio 77.4% 44.6% (+32.8)#1 44.0% (+33.4)#36
37. 07723, New Jersey 77.3% 45.0% (+32.3)#1 44.0% (+33.3)#37
38. 85623, Arizona 77.2% 44.1% (+33.1)#1 44.0% (+33.2)#38
39. 36475, Alabama 77.2% 44.6% (+32.6)#1 44.0% (+33.2)#39
40. 62865, Illinois 77.2% 43.1% (+34.1)#4 44.0% (+33.2)#40
41. 81049, Colorado 77.2% 43.6% (+33.6)#2 44.0% (+33.2)#41
42. 45831, Ohio 77.1% 44.6% (+32.5)#2 44.0% (+33.1)#42
43. 67865, Kansas 77.1% 44.4% (+32.7)#1 44.0% (+33.1)#43
44. 43066, Ohio 77.0% 44.6% (+32.4)#3 44.0% (+33.0)#44
45. 64498, Missouri 76.9% 44.1% (+32.8)#2 44.0% (+32.9)#45
46. 83434, Idaho 76.4% 44.2% (+32.2)#1 44.0% (+32.4)#46
47. 14740, New York 76.4% 42.4% (+34.0)#4 44.0% (+32.4)#47
48. 83420, Idaho 76.3% 44.2% (+32.1)#2 44.0% (+32.3)#48
49. 68844, Nebraska 76.3% 44.3% (+32.0)#4 44.0% (+32.3)#49
50. 28135, North Carolina 76.2% 44.2% (+32.0)#2 44.0% (+32.2)#50
51. 40510, Kentucky 76.2% 44.2% (+32.0)#1 44.0% (+32.2)#51
52. 52554, Iowa 76.2% 44.6% (+31.6)#3 44.0% (+32.2)#52
53. 31044, Georgia 76.1% 44.4% (+31.7)#1 44.0% (+32.1)#53
54. 98624, Washington 76.1% 43.0% (+33.1)#2 44.0% (+32.1)#54
55. 57748, South Dakota 76.1% 46.5% (+29.6)#3 44.0% (+32.1)#55
56. 50444, Iowa 76.0% 44.6% (+31.4)#4 44.0% (+32.0)#56
57. 17769, Pennsylvania 75.7% 44.2% (+31.5)#3 44.0% (+31.7)#57
58. 65470, Missouri 75.5% 44.1% (+31.4)#3 44.0% (+31.5)#58
59. 76821, Texas 75.3% 43.1% (+32.2)#3 44.0% (+31.3)#59
60. 66431, Kansas 75.3% 44.4% (+30.9)#2 44.0% (+31.3)#60
61. 62244, Illinois 75.2% 43.1% (+32.1)#5 44.0% (+31.2)#61
62. 95914, California 75.2% 43.4% (+31.8)#2 44.0% (+31.2)#62
63. 47145, Indiana 75.1% 44.5% (+30.6)#2 44.0% (+31.1)#63
64. 05070, Vermont 75.1% 49.0% (+26.1)#3 44.0% (+31.1)#64
65. 15962, Pennsylvania 75.1% 44.2% (+30.9)#4 44.0% (+31.1)#65
66. 96134, California 74.7% 43.4% (+31.3)#3 44.0% (+30.7)#66
67. 82639, Wyoming 74.6% 46.7% (+27.9)#1 44.0% (+30.6)#67
68. 64682, Missouri 74.4% 44.1% (+30.3)#4 44.0% (+30.4)#68
69. 93445, California 74.3% 43.4% (+30.9)#4 44.0% (+30.3)#69
70. 70354, Louisiana 74.3% 43.8% (+30.5)#2 44.0% (+30.3)#70
71. 76443, Texas 74.3% 43.1% (+31.2)#4 44.0% (+30.3)#71
72. 15637, Pennsylvania 74.3% 44.2% (+30.1)#5 44.0% (+30.3)#72
73. 46731, Indiana 74.3% 44.5% (+29.8)#3 44.0% (+30.3)#73
74. 22535, Virginia 74.3% 43.9% (+30.4)#3 44.0% (+30.3)#74
75. 79252, Texas 74.2% 43.1% (+31.1)#5 44.0% (+30.2)#75
76. 49338, Michigan 74.2% 44.4% (+29.8)#1 44.0% (+30.2)#76
77. 94567, California 74.2% 43.4% (+30.8)#5 44.0% (+30.2)#77
78. 57213, South Dakota 74.2% 46.5% (+27.7)#4 44.0% (+30.2)#78
79. 25962, West Virginia 74.1% 45.7% (+28.4)#2 44.0% (+30.1)#79
80. 30730, Georgia 74.1% 44.4% (+29.7)#2 44.0% (+30.1)#80
81. 79343, Texas 74.1% 43.1% (+31.0)#6 44.0% (+30.1)#81
82. 95488, California 74.1% 43.4% (+30.7)#6 44.0% (+30.1)#82
83. 34216, Florida 74.0% 46.0% (+28.0)#1 44.0% (+30.0)#83
84. 76251, Texas 73.8% 43.1% (+30.7)#7 44.0% (+29.8)#84
85. 67658, Kansas 73.8% 44.4% (+29.4)#3 44.0% (+29.8)#85
86. 46996, Indiana 73.7% 44.5% (+29.2)#4 44.0% (+29.7)#86
87. 01229, Massachusetts 73.6% 44.0% (+29.6)#1 44.0% (+29.6)#87
88. 71638, Arkansas 73.5% 43.2% (+30.3)#2 44.0% (+29.5)#88
89. 50628, Iowa 73.4% 44.6% (+28.8)#5 44.0% (+29.4)#89
90. 61067, Illinois 73.4% 43.1% (+30.3)#6 44.0% (+29.4)#90
91. 51230, Iowa 73.3% 44.6% (+28.7)#6 44.0% (+29.3)#91
92. 96065, California 73.3% 43.4% (+29.9)#7 44.0% (+29.3)#92
93. 54430, Wisconsin 73.3% 45.3% (+28.0)#1 44.0% (+29.3)#93
94. 18430, Pennsylvania 73.3% 44.2% (+29.1)#6 44.0% (+29.3)#94
95. 10537, New York 73.2% 42.4% (+30.8)#5 44.0% (+29.2)#95
96. 13658, New York 73.2% 42.4% (+30.8)#6 44.0% (+29.2)#96
97. 76935, Texas 73.2% 43.1% (+30.1)#8 44.0% (+29.2)#97
98. 15345, Pennsylvania 73.2% 44.2% (+29.0)#7 44.0% (+29.2)#98
99. 78672, Texas 73.2% 43.1% (+30.1)#9 44.0% (+29.2)#99
100. 58783, North Dakota 73.2% 45.0% (+28.2)#2 44.0% (+29.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States are:
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
99612 has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States with 94.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.