Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.7410860.1%33.5%(+26.6)#2533.4%(+26.7)#1,433
2.7411057.2%33.5%(+23.7)#3633.4%(+23.8)#2,215
3.7412652.8%33.5%(+19.3)#5533.4%(+19.4)#3,575
4.7411247.2%33.5%(+13.7)#8333.4%(+13.8)#5,610
5.7411445.6%33.5%(+12.1)#9133.4%(+12.2)#6,181
6.7412741.4%33.5%(+7.90)#11633.4%(+8.00)#7,816
7.7411937.9%33.5%(+4.40)#14033.4%(+4.50)#9,276
8.7413436.2%33.5%(+2.70)#15633.4%(+2.80)#10,006
9.7412036.1%33.5%(+2.60)#15733.4%(+2.70)#10,049
10.7410534.9%33.5%(+1.40)#16833.4%(+1.50)#10,563
11.7414534.5%33.5%(+1.000)#17333.4%(+1.10)#10,762
12.7412934.4%33.5%(+0.900)#17833.4%(+1.00)#10,825
13.7410734.1%33.5%(+0.600)#18033.4%(+0.700)#10,926
14.7413733.8%33.5%(+0.300)#18233.4%(+0.400)#11,044
15.7410332.7%33.5%(-0.800)#19533.4%(-0.700)#11,513
16.7413631.6%33.5%(-1.90)#20433.4%(-1.80)#11,950
17.7410630.8%33.5%(-2.70)#20733.4%(-2.60)#12,285
18.7413530.4%33.5%(-3.10)#21533.4%(-3.00)#12,465
19.7414629.4%33.5%(-4.10)#22433.4%(-4.00)#12,855
20.7411527.3%33.5%(-6.20)#23833.4%(-6.10)#13,616
21.7413327.2%33.5%(-6.30)#24033.4%(-6.20)#13,634
22.7410421.6%33.5%(-11.9)#28433.4%(-11.8)#15,513
23.7417120.6%33.5%(-12.9)#29133.4%(-12.8)#16,054

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
60.1%
#2
57.2%
#3
52.8%
#4
47.2%
#5
45.6%
#6
41.4%
#7
37.9%
#8
36.2%
#9
36.1%
#10
34.9%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK?
74108 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK with 60.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Tulsa is 31.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Oklahoma is 33.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.