Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Condo/Apartment Residency
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Detached Home Residency vs State vs National
1.7410394.3%7.5%(+86.8)#113.8%(+80.5)#102
2.7411967.2%7.5%(+59.7)#313.8%(+53.4)#360
3.7413634.9%7.5%(+27.4)#613.8%(+21.1)#1,010
4.7413229.6%7.5%(+22.1)#813.8%(+15.8)#1,320
5.7414628.2%7.5%(+20.7)#1013.8%(+14.4)#1,420
6.7413327.4%7.5%(+19.9)#1113.8%(+13.6)#1,486
7.7412024.2%7.5%(+16.7)#1513.8%(+10.4)#1,812
8.7413518.9%7.5%(+11.4)#1713.8%(+5.10)#2,653
9.7410518.4%7.5%(+10.9)#1913.8%(+4.60)#2,748
10.7413717.8%7.5%(+10.3)#2213.8%(+4.00)#2,866
11.7412916.4%7.5%(+8.90)#2613.8%(+2.60)#3,200
12.7414515.9%7.5%(+8.40)#2713.8%(+2.10)#3,340
13.7410414.4%7.5%(+6.90)#3213.8%(+0.600)#3,789
14.7413412.9%7.5%(+5.40)#3713.8%(-0.900)#4,266
15.7410710.8%7.5%(+3.30)#4413.8%(-3.00)#5,128
16.7411210.6%7.5%(+3.10)#4513.8%(-3.20)#5,217
17.741169.1%7.5%(+1.60)#5313.8%(-4.70)#5,986
18.741068.9%7.5%(+1.40)#5413.8%(-4.90)#6,079
19.741286.6%7.5%(-0.900)#7713.8%(-7.20)#7,714
20.741276.4%7.5%(-1.10)#8113.8%(-7.40)#7,887
21.741144.4%7.5%(-3.10)#9913.8%(-9.40)#9,752
22.741153.6%7.5%(-3.90)#11213.8%(-10.2)#10,715
23.741102.1%7.5%(-5.40)#15913.8%(-11.7)#13,186
24.741080.80%7.5%(-6.70)#21713.8%(-13.0)#16,147
25.741260.60%7.5%(-6.90)#23913.8%(-13.2)#16,675
26.741310.40%7.5%(-7.10)#27013.8%(-13.4)#17,452

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
94.3%
#2
67.2%
#3
34.9%
#4
29.6%
#5
28.2%
#6
27.4%
#7
24.2%
#8
18.9%
#9
18.4%
#10
17.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa, OK with 94.3%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Tulsa is 18.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in Oklahoma is 7.5%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States?
Percentage of Households Residing in Condos/Apartments in the United States is 13.8%.