Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Micronesia No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Micronesia
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Micronesia
17.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Micronesia No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,483,285 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.340 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,571,663 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 72.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Minimum | 0.54% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 44.4% | 22.3% |
Range | 43.9% | 21.5% |
Mean | 9.5% | 7.5% |
Median | 6.8% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Alaska Native (17.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Jamaican (17.9%, a difference of 2.9%), Immigrants from Belarus (16.7%, a difference of 4.1%), Immigrants from Ghana (16.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (18.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
Albanians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.4% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 19.6% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Australian (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |