Shoshone vs Romanian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Shoshone
Romanian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Shoshone
Romanians
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Romanian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,540,828 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,027,311 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Romanian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 15.4% | 39.2% |
| Range | 14.3% | 37.9% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 10.2% |
| Median | 5.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Romanians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Pueblo (10.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Iroquois (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Cambodian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 36.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 34.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 33.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 10.7% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
| Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
| Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
| Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |